SO, HOW DO YOU DO THINGS OVER THERE COBBER?
By Laura Forster, Policy and Communications Consultant, CSPP
Laura Forster, a communications consultant with the Centre for Scottish Public Policy (CSPP), spent some time in Australia after she graduated. SPN asked her to reflect on some comparisons and contrasts between Scotland and Australia:
Australia is one of only two countries out of the 30 OECD countries not to enter into a recession. Rather than pursue a deficit reduction policy as we have in the UK, Australia opted for a fiscal stimulus in the form of $900 cash handouts to increase consumer spending and allied to a continuing boom in the exploitation of mineral resource. So although both countries adopted forms of Keynesian policy, the way in which each government chose to respond to the recession has led the UK (and therefore Scotland) and Australia to be in very different socio-economic places.
Having worked in a public policy think-tank in Australia, the Centre for Policy Development (CPD), I have seen first hand how this has enabled Australia the freedom to focus on other areas of policy, such as social policy, rather than economic policy.
As Scotland has had to deal with the consequences of Coalition policies such as welfare cuts, part of those austerity measures, we have not yet got around to addressing the issues that Australia is currently focusing on. They are now able to look at what they call their ‘Common Wealth’. This covers their ‘soft assets’ such as standards of behavior in public life and quality of family and community life, which they fear are threatened by problems such as widening inequality and high levels of personal debt. Though these problems are also present in Scotland as, since devolution was launched, the inequality gap has not lessened in education, income, or other aspects of life.
As Scotland has had to deal with the consequences of Coalition policies such as welfare cuts, part of those austerity measures, we have not yet got around to addressing the issues that Australia is currently focusing on
However, it is not just Scotland that could be learning from Australia. While not needing to address problems that result from a recession, Australia is able to study us - to “turn our gaze to the radical public sector changes that are in full swing in the United Kingdom and to consider what they could mean for Australia.” (CPD). Focusing critically on David Cameron’s Big Society they take the view that weakening the public sector doesn’t automatically strengthen the community. In my opinion, Scotland and Australia seem to agree here. Australia might be able to learn from our experiences, as there are some fears that the ‘Big Society’ themes are generating interest and support amongst conservative think tanks and politicians in Australia.
Though the debate of ‘localisation versus centralisation’ that keeps resurfacing in Scotland may sound as if it sits well with David Cameron’s idea of a Big Society, the direct and immediate impact has been welfare cuts which have forced local government to change the way it delivers services. However this is what Australia, like Scotland, fears. One survey found that two fifths of people see the Big Society as a cover for spending cuts and the Australian think tank I worked at took the same view.
By contrast, the size, role and function of government receive much less critical debate in Australia. So why is it so heavily debated here? Is it because since devolution Scotland hasn’t made up her mind where power should lie?
By contrast, the size, role and function of government receive much less critical debate in Australia. So why is it so heavily debated here? Is it because since devolution Scotland hasn’t made up her mind where power should lie? And is where authority and decision making should rest being decided on a unilateral basis for different public services, or for all public services? It seems we’re still struggling with these questions whereas, although Australia also believes it has similar top–down processes that need to be changed, they don’t question that the problem may be where the decisions are made.
While think tanks in Scotland are questioning this and other issues such as education, transparency of democracy and health, Australian think tanks are writing reports such as ‘farming smarter; not harder’ which are discussing how they can help feed the world: a much more worthy cause. It appears that Australia overall has a grander vision. However is it that Scotland requires more resources to be able to debate such topics? Currently Scotland has very few think tanks and these were created after devolution - so with independence could we see more such organisations emerge?
The Scottish Government is looking towards what they believe will be a ‘better‘ Scotland come 2014. Not surprisingly a lot of discussion recently has focused on the independence referendum and whether or not this would better address Scotland’s social and economic problems.
Could we, without the constrictions of welfare cuts and having to debate what changes this will cause, be able to focus on other policy areas that are more likely to close the inequality gap in Scotland? Or does Scotland require more resources to even begin to look at this?
By Laura Forster, Policy and Communications Consultant, CSPP
OTHER ARTICLES IN THIS ISSUE
- Editorial
- Its Blue Lights and Prevention
- In My View...
- Small Business Growth Needs An Effective Finance Function
- International School Meals Day - Policy in Practice
- ScotRail's Focus on the Future
- Growing Our Rail Network
- SNH wants to encourage people onto trains in the Year of Natural Scotland
- How Can We Innovate Using the Internet?
- Scotland: Rich Country? Poor Country? Rich People? Poor People?
- So, how do you do things over there cobber?
- Policy Shorts
Issue 5
GOVERNMENT, PUBLIC SERVICES, MODERNISATION
- The Road to Regionalisation? Conversations on Further Education
- Public Services Reform and Public Opinion
- The Enabling State - A new relationship between public services and the public they serve?
- Why Complaints Matter
- Can you shove your granny on the bus?
- How Diverse Can We Be? The Commission on School Reform
- What is the future for Social Investment in Scotland?
PREVIOUS ISSUES
Looking for a previous issue? Use the menu below to select an issue.
MOST READ ARTICLES
- Bringing alive the Digital Participation Charter for Scotland's citizens, communities and businesses
- Transport for Edinburgh - Integrated Transport for a Smart City
- Worth more than the First Minister? Senior Salaries in Scottish Quangos
- A Planet of Smart Cities: Scotland's digital challenge
- Dundee: From Waterfront redevelopment to city economy regeneration
- Social Business Can Transform Public Services
- Success secrets shared: Learning from the best Mittelstand and British global niche champions
- Public Services Reform and Public Opinion
- Increasing digital participation levels in Scotland - what needs to happen next?
- The Evolving Public Sector Response to Budget Challenges