IMAGINING A FAIRER FIFE
By Martyn Evans, Chief Executive, Carnegie Trust UK
When I was invited to chair the Commission I was sure about the moral case. I am now convinced of the economic and social case for fairness.
Then read what the OECD (the club for the richest countries in the world) reported in 2015; “There is an urgent call for governments to address inequalities. This (rising inequality) takes a toll on the social fabric of communities, places a heavy economic cost on future growth, and reduces trust in governments and institutions. It is no exaggeration to say that this could put at risk the democratic process as people may become permanently disengaged if they feel that governments of all stripes no longer work for them.”
One of the key observations of the Fairer Fife Commission was that while inequality was certainly a moral issue for some, it is also an under-recognised but critical economic and social issue for every single one of us. When I was invited to chair the Commission I was sure about the moral case. I am now convinced of the economic and social case for fairness.
We had a great membership of Commissioners - all of whom agreed without hesitation to spend time and considerable effort on gathering evidence, reviewing it, visiting and listening to people and drafting the final report. We wanted our report, which we called Fairness Matters, to be accessible and ambitious but also practical and achievable. You will have to judge for yourself if we achieved our aims.
The Commission devised its own working definition of fairness as there is no generally accepted one. We sought to arrive at a definition which was both optimistic and much wider than material deprivation. We settled on the following. A fair Fife is where all residents have the capability to lead good lives, make choices and reach their full potential and where all children are safe, healthy and happy. The last phrase was taken directly from the evidence given to us by looked-after children in Fife. They spent an engaging and enjoyable morning with Commissioners telling their stories and hopes for the future.
Fairness is not simply an objective for one service, organisation or sector. We argue there is a need to develop a shared commitment to fairness and promote ways of working across policy and sectors. We used the term ‘mega-community’. This is taken from USA where it is argued the wicked issues of the 21st century; “cannot be solved by government, business or civil society alone. It takes a mega-community of all three.” The Commission was often told about the gross defects and deficiencies of another sector or service by a different sector or service. Early on we established the rule that you could not criticise a sector or service that was not in the room. This led to significantly more constructive and much shorter meetings!
The Commission was impressed by the extensive quality and quantity of data on poverty and inequality. We are very definitely a data-rich society. However we concluded that describing inequality has far more status than trying to resolve it. Much more needs to be done to use the data to help and support change and also to reinforce and replicate innovations that the evidence says work. We recommended Fife Partnership create a ‘knowledge hub’ which would amalgamate data and analytics from the partners.
We made 40 recommendations in all. Our central theses was that Fife Community Planning Partnership should be even more ambitious in its aspirations. We asked that by 2030 Fife be in the top 5 of all Scottish local authorities for all the fairness measure we identified. The recommendations were across and between the sectors. For example the Fife voluntary sector has to encourage 35,494 more volunteers to make in to the ‘top 5 spot’. The further and higher education sectors has to ensure there are 15,340 more people with qualifications. The private sector has to find ways to increase the median wage by £55.30 a week. The NHS has to find ways to improve the mental health of 9,530 people. And so the list of recommendations goes on. We tried hard to make the numbers as precise as possible from the evidence available to us. By being so precise with numbers we hoped to focus attention on the human side rather than statistics.
We had no doubt that Fife has hugely capable, knowledgeable and committed people working in all sectors. In our view Fife could make a very considerable contribution to a fairer Scotland. After all Fife Council alone is due to spend £15billion and 230,000 years of staff time over the period to 2030. Viewed at this scale, the challenge of affecting the life chances of the 75,000 people living in poverty in Fife does not look insurmountable. We recognised that Fife, as with all local authorities, works within a context of decisions made by the Scottish Government and the UK Government. The worst case scenario is where Fife spends its limited (but still very considerable) human and financial resources trying to mitigate the effect of policies it did not make. This is the challenge for the wider Fairer Scotland debate and decisions.
We used the term ‘mega-community’. This is taken from USA where it is argued the wicked issues of the 21st century; “cannot be solved by government, business or civil society alone. It takes a mega-community of all three.”
Is Chief Executive of Carnegie Trust UK – which is based in Dunfermline
By Martyn Evans, Chief Executive, Carnegie Trust UK
OTHER ARTICLES IN THIS ISSUE
- The changing nature of residential investment in Scotland
- The Benefits of Confidential Reporting
- Imagining a Fairer Fife
- Time to Refocus Regeneration Resources?
- What is evidence and what is it telling us to do?
- Analysing, advising, researching and arguing
- Digital exclusion - is the 3rd Sector missing the bus?
- Planning for a Fairer Scotland
- Stressed out? Let's do something about it.
- In working order? The state of Scotland's labour market
- Tartanising the Apprenticeship Levy
- Thinking Big on Affordable House Building - a common sense policy?
- Time for a Transient Visitor Levy?
- Community Finance can challenge money market failure
- Developing Carluke
SCOTLAND'S LOW CARBON OPPORTUNITY
Currently, Scotland is living a three planet lifestyle. This means if everyone in the world lived as we do, we would need three planets to survive. The world population is growing, resources are becoming scarcer and the effects of climate change are starting to be recognised. This is simply unsustainable.
- Carbon, energy and the environment: We need to move on from talking about climate change to acting on climate change.
- Finding balance in the low-carbon transition
- Greening the Centre of Scotland
- Meeting the cost of reducing carbon
- The Carbon Cycle?
- The role of nature-based solutions in combatting the climate crisis
Looking for a previous issue? Use the menu below to select an issue.
MOST READ ARTICLES
- Transport for Edinburgh - Integrated Transport for a Smart City
- Worth more than the First Minister? Senior Salaries in Scottish Quangos
- Social Business Can Transform Public Services
- Bringing alive the Digital Participation Charter for Scotland's citizens, communities and businesses
- Dundee: From Waterfront redevelopment to city economy regeneration
- A Planet of Smart Cities: Scotland's digital challenge
- Public Services Reform and Public Opinion
- Increasing digital participation levels in Scotland - what needs to happen next?
- Telehealth and Telecare for Older People
- The Evolving Public Sector Response to Budget Challenges